Dave Holland – Reform UK Mid Bedfordshire Constituency PPC (Prospective Parliamentary Candidate)

Big business & multinationals lobby for continued cheap imported labour because it is more cost effective for them in the short term. Meanwhile the country faces increased welfare costs and pressure on services.

In the UK an individual needs to earn £55k to pay enough tax to self fund their public services (Approx £16k per year), the harsh truth, the reality is that everyone who earns less than that is drawing on taxpayers not contributing to a thriving society.

Ultimately for the UK to thrive we need people to contribute more than they consume in public services. I am not being cruel or attempting to victimise or accuse anyone, but stating an economic fact. State spending currently accounts for almost 50% of GDP, in the 1980’s it was a little over 30%.

We need to reduce our running costs by reducing the massive spending who have made a decision not to work. If you can receive £23k on welfare then you would need to earn £30k+ to be as well off and you wouldn’t have all day sat in front of your TV doing nothing.

This needs to change. Basic economics says we can’t afford to finance the volume of work shy that we currently have.

Elements within the civil service appear to be openly defying the cabinet and preventing them from carrying out their mandated business.

This situation can’t be allowed to continue. Our civil service needs to be non-political. It cannot be allowed to interfere with the business of an elected politician.

If the civil service run the country our can influence our elected MPs then what is the point of having elections?

In good years Bankers contribute significantly to the governments coffers. In the bad years we, the tax payers have to bail out the banks and bankers, none of whom seem to ever lose their jobs or be punished for their mismanagement of their business.

Additionally, if your business, in this instance a bank is deemed too big to fail then you have a taxpayer funded guarantee against failure. If you are in the business of gambling on the stock market then what incentive do you have to be responsible?

Bankers have the power to manipulate markets. As we saw with the brief Liz Truss premiership, bankers moved the markets against her, effectively forcing her replacement.

Do we want bankers to choose our policy? I believe that our elected MPs should be free to set their policies and agenda. Bankers should have to trade within those policies. Additionally no bank should be considered too big to fail. It sends out the wrong message.

In future, the state should cover personal losses in the event of a bank failure rather than guaranteeing a banks survival.

The Blob is a collective name for the radical, progressive liberal left wing, who have in the last few decades infiltrated education, Parliament, the civil service, the police force, the judiciary and even the military.

This has been a proactive campaign to get liberal progressives into positions of influence in order to manipulate our institutions. This process began back in the 1980’s within our education system. Our universities have changed. The ratio of left wing lecturers has increased since the 1970’s, bringing a left leaning culture into our education system.

Graduates from the 1980’s are now well into their careers and in positions to influence the national curriculum within education, in high powered roles within the civil service & across the public sector.

This demographic infiltration has reached a level whereby it can be clearly seen and is so pervasive and settled that there is less of a requirement to conceal their activities.

This is what we are up against, this is why we have drag queens reading inappropriate stories to very young children. This is why we have a growing generation of anxious, scared young people who believe the world is about to end.

There are two opposing forces battling for control of not just the UK but all western countries. You are either a globalist or a nationalist. Globalists believe in open borders, freedom of movement, dominant multinational businesses, too big to pay tax in the country they trade in.

Globalists believe in one world government, unelected bodies shuch as the EU, WHO & WEF having influence and control over individual countries.

Nationalists believe in national sovereignty, in having accountable MPs that cand be removed if they fail to deliver on the wishes of the electorate.

On the one hand, I can understand the basic premis of having a world government made up of the leaders from all 195 countries. We are, whatever our nationality or ethnicity just a bunch of monkeys clinging to a rock, spinning through space. We are tribal by nature, whether that be by nationality, religion, ethnicity, etc.

If we want all countries of the world to pull together in the same direction then maybe a world government is a step in that direction.

Currently however, that isn’t where we are. We have only got as far as competing trading blocks, EU, BRICs, etc. Currently competing to be the biggest, most powerful trading entity. So bigger tribes, but far from unified.

I suspect that we are a long way away from unity and harmony across the planet so one world governance may be some way off, regardless of what the pro globalist lobby may believe.